T5 Paignton Town Centre improvements
In Paignton Town Centre, it is proposed
to improve the environment by introducing environmental and
pedestrian space enhancement schemes at:-
(a) Hyde Road;
(b) Station Square;
(c) Esplanade Road; and
(d) the Harbour area.
Explanation:
15.64 Paignton town centre is located at the focus of
a number of routes, particularly the north-south coast route
and the main route into Totnes from the east. As a result, it
suffers significantly from a large number of local traffic movements
passing through the town in different directions. The Esplanade
on the seafront provides a relatively congestion free route around
the town centre but this is inaccessible for traffic approaching
from the west. Within the town centre, Hyde Road/Great Western
Road and Torquay Road form relatively congested internal one-way
system which provides for through movement in the north-south
direction.
15.65 The town centre is an important shopping centre
and also attracts large numbers of holiday visitors during the
peak of the season. There are significant pedestrian conflicts
between moving and parked vehicles in some parts of the town
centre and it is proposed, therefore, to undertake a number of
enhancement schemes which are aimed at improving conditions for
pedestrians. In particular, closure to traffic during the working
day has been implemented at Victoria Street and Parkside Road.
Space and environmental improvements (including hard and soft
landscaping) are to be investigated for Hyde Road, Station Square
and other areas in that vicinity. However, it is important that
adequate access for emergency and service vehicles is retained.
Further analysis of transport issues within the town and detailed
recommendations are set out in the Paignton Central Area Transport
Study (Parsons Brinckerhoff, December 2002).
T6 Brixham Town Centre improvements
In Brixham Town Centre it is proposed
to improve the environment by:-
(1) improving the pedestrian links between
Fore Street and Middle Street via a pedestrianised Union Lane;
(2) improving the servicing arrangements for
properties in Fore Street, whilst enhancing the pedestrian
priority schemes;
(3) providing a new access road to the Fish
Quays and Oxen Cove, as part of the Brixham Harbour regeneration
scheme;
(4) supporting the redevelopment of the town
centre car park in Brixham (incorporating a medium scale provision
of new shopping and residential uses) to provide short stay
parking with priority for shoppers; and
(5) providing a car park for long-stay parking
at Torbay Trading Estate, New Road, in association with the
above.
Explanation:
15.66 Brixham town centre is made up of a variety of narrow
streets with limited parking and difficult conditions for larger
vehicles. Fore Street is closed to traffic during the working
day. Key improvement proposals include the redevelopment of the
town centre car park as part of a residential and shopping development
(see Proposals H1.18 and S5.4).
This car park would be enhanced in its role for short-stay parking
for shopping. Longer-stay visitor parking may at some future
stage in the Plan period be provided through a park and ride
scheme (see Policy T11). Such schemes are considered
to be an integral part of the Council’s Transportation
Strategy and can help to reduce town centre congestion and pollution.
Whilst limited improvement to the current situation is possible
without major demolition, it is proposed to improve the pedestrian
circulation by various minor schemes in the vicinity of Fore
Street. Regeneration of the Brixham harbourside and waterfront
(see Policy TU1) requires that good pedestrian
links are provided and that the issue of parking in Brixham is
addressed. It is important that adequate provision is made for
emergency and service vehicles.
15.67 Oxen Cove/Freshwater is the alternative main car
park for the town centre and has an extremely poor access. It
is currently used as the main stopping point by coaches for visitors
to the town centre. There is also a scheme to improve conditions
at the Fish Quays (part of the Brixham Harbour Improvement Scheme),
including a proposal for a new access road which can also serve
to improve arrangements for accessing the existing car park.
T7 Access for people with disabilities
Access for people with physical and sensory
disabilities will be enhanced in particular by:-
(1) improvement of principal pedestrian routes
between focal points in the town centres where topography permits
(e.g. civic buildings, main shops, community, leisure and eating
areas and public transport stops) to ensure that they can be
negotiated by unassisted people with disabilities; and
(2) identifying and addressing difficulties
with car parks, pedestrian areas, and other related infrastructure
to ensure that there is no particular disadvantage incurred
by this group of travellers.
Explanation:
15.68 There is an increasing focus on the problems faced
by disabled people in achieving access to shops, local services
and other important functions of the town centres. It is estimated
that around 5% of the Torbay population have moderate to severe
disabilities which rises to around 15% if the definition is extended
to those who have some form or degree of disability.
15.69 The Torbay Council Equalities Group is consulted
on proposals for improvements and planning applications. Improvements
to these services will be considered through the programmes in
the LTP. The Council supports shop-mobility schemes in Torquay
and Paignton and a Ring and Ride Service for those whose disability
qualifies them for particular assistance. An important consideration
is now the implementation of the Disability Discrimination Act
1995 which requires organisations, property owners and employers
to ensure that people with disabilities can gain appropriate
access to services and properties and are not discriminated against
because of their disability. The Council will meet the requirements
of this Act and ensure that those with whom they have dealings
are also aware and follow the requirements to improve conditions
for the disabled.
15.70 It is particularly important to recognise that many
disabled and mobility impaired people depend on using a private
motor vehicle as the most convenient and sensible form of access
to town centres and other public places. The Council will, through
the Local Transport Plan, pursue improvement schemes such as
dropped kerbs, pedestrian priority, tactile paving and the removal
of highway obstructions to ensure ease of movement for people
with wheel chairs, visual disabilities and other problems. The
Council will also support the improvement of public transport
and related facilities which will be accessible to people with
physical and sensory difficulties.
15.71 The up-grading of existing buildings, and provision
of access and facilities for use by disabled people in new development
is covered by Building Regulations. However identifying such
issues within the Development Control process can help ensure
the provision of facilities and assist the effective operation
of the development process.
T8 Lorry parking
The provision of lorry parks will be permitted
in locations which:-
(1) do not adversely affect the amenities
of residential areas;
(2) are well-related to employment areas;
and
(3) are close to convenient public transport
and accommodation.
Explanation:
15.72 The existing areas of lorry parking are at Lymington
Road, Torquay and on the Leisure Centre Car Park at Clennon Valley,
Paignton. In both cases there is some conflict with other users
and these sites tend to draw lorries through residential and
tourist areas and are somewhat remote from the main areas of
access for such vehicles. The Council will therefore be reviewing
these arrangements and looking for improved locations for lorry
parking as part of on-going development of this transport strategy.
The Government have published a policy document ‘Sustainable
Distribution: A Strategy’ (March 1999) which seeks to integrate
freight transport with sustainability and other areas of Government
policy. This will be taken into account when progressing proposals
for lorry parking and routing. In particular this requires that
the Council works with freight operators and businesses to reduce
problems such as congestion, emissions and noise arising from
freight distribution.
T9 Bus network measures
The Council will implement measures to
give buses priority where congestion occurs in order to improve
the efficiency and frequency of services. Locations at which
such measures will be introduced will include:-
(1) Tweenaways Cross junction, Paignton;
(2) Windy Corner junction, Paignton; and
(3) The A379 Dartmouth Road/A3022 New Road
junction, Churston.
Explanation:
15.73 Bus services are more attractive where journey times
are reduced and punctuality is increased. Highway bus priority
measures address both of these important factors. Through both
low tech solutions, such as bus lanes and high tech telematic
solutions the Council will place a high emphasis on the development
of bus priority. This will commence with the principal coast
route (bus service 12) linking Brixham, Paignton and Torquay
with Newton Abbot.
15.74 Working in partnership with bus operators, the aim
will be to maximise the benefits of investment in bus priority
schemes and encourage reciprocal investment in vehicles and services
by operators. Consideration will be given to the introduction
of local bus quality standards, where access to parts of the
highway network will only be given to operators who meet at least
the minimum standard. The intention, in time, is to provide a
network of strategically linked bus priority measures that cumulatively
result in significant time savings for passengers.
T10 Transportation interchanges
Improved facilities for interchange for
all appropriate forms of transport services in Torbay are proposed
at the following locations:-
(1) Torre Railway Station, Torquay;
(2) Lymington Road, Torquay;
(3) Torquay Railway Station;
(4) The Strand, Torquay;
(5) Victoria Car Park, Paignton;
(6) Paignton Bus and Railway Stations;
(7) Goodrington Station, Paignton;
(8) Churston Station; and
(9) Bank Lane, Brixham.
Explanation:
15.75 The improvement of bus and rail interchange facilities
represents a major facet of the transport strategy for Torbay.
It is recognised that to achieve growth in public transport use,
emphasis needs to be placed upon the quality, the comprehensiveness
and the convenience of interchange facilities. The vision is
to achieve an integrated transport system, where interchange
facilities promote the notion of the seamless journey, with improved
links between appropriate modes of transport, in particular bus
and rail. This will be achieved through the Local Transport Plan.
15.76 This strategy will be promoted in partnership with
station owners/transport operators and should link together with
plans for enhancing the range of bus/rail services provided.
Improvements to interchange facilities will involve:-
1. safer pedestrian routes;
2. safer cycling routes;
3. improved forecourt access for bus services;
4. improved taxi ranks;
5. more comprehensive provision of information;
6. improved lighting and signage; and
7. improved passenger facilities.
15.77 Improvement of Paignton railway and bus stations
will be pursued as part of a wider redevelopment scheme (see Policies
H1.14, E1.13, S2 (TM7), S5.3 and Policy
T15).
T11 Park and ride
A park and ride scheme is proposed at
Lawes Bridge, Torquay.
Park and ride schemes elsewhere will be permitted
where they:-
(1) contribute to the objectives of Policy
TS in developing a sustainable Transportation Strategy, improving
accessibility and reducing town centre congestion and pollution;
(2) are located on the edge of, or close to,
the built up area, preferably near to radial and orbital routes,
in order to maximise accessibility from the surrounding catchment
area;
(3) do not have an unacceptable adverse impact
on prevailing landscape, nature conservation, countryside and
agricultural land protection policies; and
(4) have satisfactory vehicular access and
do not create conditions of danger to road users.
Explanation:
15.78 The establishment of a strategically located park
and ride scheme on the northern fringe of Torquay and the consideration
of possible schemes serving Brixham and Paignton are integral
elements of the Council’s transportation strategy. A site
at Lawes Bridge is proposed to serve Torquay. No specific site
has been identified to serve Brixham or Paignton; however, if
a suitable site comes forward during the Plan period, it will
be assessed on the basis of the criteria set out above.
15.79 The Lawes Bridge site, situated off the A3022, Riviera
Way, is easily accessible to traffic coming into Torquay (on
the main arterial route) using a new slip road which has recently
been completed in conjunction with adjacent development. This
site is intended to attract commuters, hospital visitors, shoppers
and tourist visitors. There are two possible routes into town,
on which bus priority measures could be implemented, to ensure
a rapid journey time. Complementary parking restraint measures
will be required in the town centre.
15.80 Properly located park and ride schemes can help
to reduce town centre congestion and pollution. They can also
lead to a reduction in car journey length and improve the accessibility
of urban centres. PPG13 ‘Transport’ (2001) (paragraphs
59-63) suggests that park and ride schemes are most effective
where:-
-
they are located a reasonable distance from the urban centre
which they serve, ideally at the intersection of radial and
orbital routes;
-
an urban centre is served by a number of high quality sites;
-
services are complemented with measures on bus priority
and car use in urban centres; and
-
they are part of an overall strategy for sustainable transport.
PPG13 states that park and ride schemes should not be designed
to increase the total public parking stock available in a
town, or encourage additional travel (paragraph 61).
15.81 In pursuing park and ride schemes, particular attention
will be paid to ensuring that they are attractive to motorists.
Comparison in terms of both journey time and costs will need
to favour park and ride (over town centre parking) to ensure
successful catchment. All operational aspects of these schemes
will be appraised in partnership with local bus operators as
the sites are developed. It is important that necessary access
arrangements can be made without compromising safety or causing
congestion.
15.82 Because they are often located within the urban
fringe, park and ride schemes are likely to be within areas covered
by landscape or countryside protection policies. Sites should
be appropriately located and sensitively landscaped in order
to minimise their impact on landscape, nature conservation, and
countryside interests. Facilities such as shelters and security
features (e.g. lighting and CCTV etc) are appropriate for park
and ride schemes. Schemes should be in accordance with Policy
EP5 in terms of minimising light pollution. However,
buildings and other features should be kept to a minimum where
they would conflict with other Local Plan Policies. In particular,
park and ride schemes should not be seen as setting an undesirable
precedent for creeping urbanisation of the site or surrounding
area.
15.83 Further information on the creation and operation
of Park and Ride schemes is available on the Department of Transport
website.
T12 Lymington Road Coach Station
The improvement of passenger facilities at Lymington
Road Coach Station, Torquay is proposed.
Explanation:
15.84 Located on the fringe of Torquay’s central
area, the coach station (which is also used as an overnight park
for heavy goods vehicles - see Policy T8) has
been under-utilised for some time. Although the coach station
is used on a daily basis for scheduled express coach departures
to a range of national destinations, only limited use is made
of it by excursions/tour operator coach organisations. The majority
of hotel and holiday accommodation in Torquay is located away
from the coach station and there is an established practice of
parking coaches overnight within the forecourt of the associated
accommodation. However, improvements to facilities for passengers
is required.
15.85 The distance of the coach station from the centre
of the local bus network limits its extended role as a bus station.
With only a proportion of the coach station site required to
maintain existing operational activity, the re-use of part of
the site may be appropriate. Any scope for development will be
assessed in due course and outlined through a development brief
in the context of relevant Local Plan policies.
15.86 The lack of soft landscaping, facilities and general
poor quality environment is a cause for concern. In addition,
there are concerns about security, particularly at night. Schemes
for improving passenger facilities and security will therefore
be supported by the Council in principle.
T13 Railway land
Proposals for the redevelopment of railway land
will not be permitted where these would prejudice the operation
or enhancement of the railway system.
Explanation:
15.87 Rail transport to Torbay is strategically important
economically and socially. The railway will play an increasingly
important role over the next decade, with the latest forecasts
predicting a 30% plus increase in demand for passenger travel
over this period. The challenge for rail organisations and local
authorities will be to deliver much needed improvements to stations
(and services) particularly in terms of providing greater modal
integration. The availability of adjoining land at stations will
therefore play a vital role in relation to enhancement plans
at local stations. PPG13 ‘Transport’ (2001) (paragraph
48) indicates that disused land at transport interchanges, including
stations, should not be developed if this would sever their role
or potential for improving freight or passenger facilities.
T14 New railway stations
A site for a new railway station is safeguarded
at Kerswell Gardens, Torquay.
Explanation:
15.88 Torbay’s residential population is served
by only three railway stations. Only a fraction of the population
live with easy walking distance of these stations. The railway
line (which is dual track) has sufficient residual capacity to
allow for an additional station, without compromising operational
imperatives.
15.89 On the northern fringe of Torquay, the need for
a station site near Kerswell Gardens has been identified. This
facility would have potential to service the Willows District
Centre together with existing and proposed employment and residential
areas, and Torbay Hospital. An area of search to the east of
Scotts Bridge is therefore safeguarded on the Proposals Map.
The precise location and layout will be determined through the
Local Transport Plan following further investigation of site
characteristics. This process will include consideration of access
arrangements, relationship to adjoining land uses (existing and
proposed) and amenity and environmental considerations. In addition,
technical issues relating to track gradient and curvature will
also require assessment. Furthermore, the area around Hamelin
Way (to the west of Scotts Bridge) is not considered to be appropriate
because of likely conflict with the proposed junction of the
Kingskerswell Bypass (see Policy T21).
T15 Improvement of Paignton Railway Station
The redevelopment of passenger facilities and
access arrangements at Paignton Station is proposed and will
include an element of mixed retail, commercial, residential and
car parking use. The redevelopment should be an integral part
of the development proposed in Policies H1.14, E1.13, S5.3 and
T10.6.
Explanation:
15.90 The quality of the station environment and the facilities
provided for passengers at Paignton Railway Station fall short
of what both residents and visitors expect of an interchange
facility of this size. The existing arrangements at the station
also tend to segregate the Steam Railway (Dart Valley Light Railway)
from the conventional railway. Improvements to the station could
be brought about through re-development, including the relocation
of the nearby bus station within the site (Policy T10.6).
15.91 As part of this redevelopment, consideration would
be given to allow a change of use on the existing bus station
site, provided that the following conditions can be met:-
-
a development brief for the area should be prepared to
assess the implications of any re-development. This should
satisfactorily accommodate the mixed use development proposed
on the site (see Policies H1.14, E1.13, S2
(TM7), S5.3 and T10.6);
-
the bus station should be relocated and combined with the
railway station. The resultant station should be of comparable
size to the sum of the two existing stations and should not
result in significantly less operational capacity than currently
provided on the two sites. This may involve the part utilisation
of car park and brownfield land along the boundary of the
current railway station site;
-
adequate car parking space will need to be retained; and
-
adequate space should be provided for taxis to wait and
pick up passengers directly outside the station entrance.
T16 Redevelopment of Goodrington Railway
Station
The redevelopment and improvement of Goodrington
Station, including the provision of a passenger facility and
freight handling facilities, are proposed.
Explanation:
15.92 Goodrington Station, Paignton is currently used
by the Steam Railway and also on a temporary basis as a freight
facility. Freight operations have only recently returned to the
site after many years of disuse; however, further investigations
will be required to identify a long term freight market at this
site. An improved highway access to this site is proposed.
15.93 The site has a number of advantages, such as the
adjacent car park and relatively good access, and may have potential
for increased use for both freight and passengers. Further detailed
study is required of the operational and practical implications
for increasing the use of this facility. In the meantime the
existing railway operational land will be protected from development
(see Policy T13).
T17 Water transport
On-shore facilities required in conjunction
with the provision of local passenger ferry services will be
permitted in Torquay and Brixham harbours subject to suitable
access, servicing, parking, amenity and environmental safeguards.
Explanation:
15.94 The existing ferry services link Brixham and Torquay
during the summer and provide a valuable alternative form of
transport for tourists. However, the location of these ferry
services, together with potential for similar services to Paignton,
is consistent with Government policy for encouraging sustainable
alternatives to motor vehicles and reducing congestion along
the coast road. Adequate provision for landing facilities in
association with improved ferry services will be made as part
of the Torquay Waterfront Project, the Brixham Harbour Regeneration
Scheme and when considering other proposals for the redevelopment
of the harbours. The Local Transport Plan will be considering
ways in which an enhanced ferry service can be provided between
the three towns.
T18 Major Road Network
The Major Road Network for Torbay is defined
on the Proposals Map. New access points to the Major Road Network
will not be permitted where they would reduce road safety or
detract from or conflict with the function of the route.
Explanation:
15.95 The primary function of the major road network is
to cater for the longer distance movement of traffic and road-based
public transport (buses, coaches and taxis). If the capacity
of this network is compromised, traffic may seek alternative
routes through minor roads in residential and shopping areas.
Excessive delays would be a particular disadvantage to local
bus services. This network will be managed and improved in order
to maintain its operational efficiency, whilst seeking to improve
road safety, reduce conflicts and, where possible, to give adequate
priority to pedestrians, cyclists and public transport. The details
of this policy in operation will be found in the Local Transport
Plan.
15.96 Where development proposals are likely to have an
impact on the major road network, they will only be permitted
where the impact does not significantly reduce its capacity or
impose delays to essential services. New accesses must be constructed
to standards consistent with Government guidelines for safety
and operation and will need to make adequate provision for pedestrians
and cyclists. Improvements to the highway intended to ameliorate
the impact of new development may be funded by the developer,
secured by an appropriate legal agreement.
T19 District Distributor Road Network
The District Distributor Road Network for Torbay
is defined on the Proposals Map. Direct access to new premises
will not be permitted where this would reduce road safety or
detract from or conflict with the function of the route.
Explanation:
15.97 District distributor roads are through routes which
distribute traffic to and within districts. They will often provide
access to major developments and will provide key routes for
local bus services. In residential areas they form the link between
the main road network and residential roads. Facilities for pedestrians
and cyclists are particularly important on these routes. It is
therefore important to reduce the impact of turning and stopping
vehicles to a minimum.
15.98 Where development proposals are likely to have an
impact on the distributor road network, they will only be permitted
where the impact does not significantly increase traffic congestion
or difficulties for public transport, cyclists and pedestrians.
New accesses must be constructed to standards consistent with
the Government guidelines for this type of road having regard
to safety and operation, and must make provision for pedestrians
and cyclists. Improvements to the highway intended to ameliorate
the impact of new development may be funded by developer contributions
secured by appropriate legal agreements.
T20 Road improvements
Schemes involving the improvement of roads will
be permitted only where there is adequate provision for pedestrians,
cyclists, appropriate bus priority measures and conservation
interests are protected.
Explanation:
15.99 Government policy is now based on the premise that
the provision of new traffic capacity will often be self-defeating
as it tends to encourage greater use of private motor vehicles,
thus increasing pollution and traffic congestion on other sections
of the network. However, there are likely to be occasions where
local highway improvements are necessary in order to improve
road safety, secure important environmental benefits, assist
public transport operations, accommodate traffic from essential
new development or relieve particular bottlenecks or hazards.
Where new road schemes are considered essential, it is important
that they meet the overall aims of the transport strategy by
providing adequate arrangements for vulnerable road users and
public transport. The impact of the proposal on environmental
and conservation interests is an important consideration and
will need to be balanced against the economic and social benefits
of the scheme.
T21 Improved northern approach road
The route for an improved northern approach
road to Torquay is proposed. The indicative route shown on the
Proposals Map will be safeguarded to include the southern end
of the proposed A380 Kingskerswell Bypass.
Explanation:
15.100 The A380 through Kingskerswell is the most important
external communication link into Torbay with a daily average
flow of 33,000 vehicles. There has been a long established need
to seek improvements to the highway network in order to reduce
traffic congestion, mitigate the impact of this traffic on local
residents and improve the accessibility of Torbay to the regional
and national networks. The development of a bypass is considered
vital to the economic future of Torbay. Whilst outside Torbay’s
boundaries, the safety and environmental benefits for Kingskerswell
of removing the heavy volume of traffic on the existing A380
is also an important consideration. The Kingskerswell Bypass
has featured as a key priority in the County Council’s
Transport Strategy for many years and it is recognised as a programme
scheme within the Adopted Devon Structure Plan First Review (1999),
as well as the Devon Structure Plan 2001-2016 (expected to be
adopted in Summer/Autumn 2004).
15.101 The Government’s policy to allow new roads
only where there are no practical alternatives is evidenced in
its recent announcement of new bypass schemes (see paragraph
15.13). A fundamental review of the need for improvements and
the alternatives available for reducing the current problems
has been undertaken by consultants on behalf of Devon County
Council and Torbay Council. This study has confirmed that building
a new road to bypass Kingskerswell is the only practicable way
of improving access to Torbay for long distance traffic and local
public transport, as well as reducing the air pollution problems
in this corridor.
15.102 Only the southern end of the proposed Kingskerswell
Bypass is in Torbay and the Proposals Map indicates a safeguarded
area at Edginswell to accommodate the proposed route. Its indicative
land-take is based on the most recent research data available.
15.103 A number of concerns have been raised about the
impact of the proposed route upon nature conservation. It is
considered critical that the scheme has proper regard to important
habitats and that any unavoidable environmental / ecological
harm caused be adequately mitigated. Similarly, the bypass should
be part of a wider improvement scheme that seeks to encourage
alternative forms of transport and improve conditions for non-car
users within the corridor. The full assessment and implementation
of the proposed scheme will be carried out through the Devon
and Torbay Local Transport Plans, which also provide further
details of the preferred Bypass route, including its link to
Torbay. Development is programmed to take place during the later
phase of the Local Plan period.
T22 Western Corridor
Schemes are proposed to reduce traffic
congestion, improve the accessibility of existing property
and allow the release of new sites allocated for development
along the Western Corridor route including:-
(1) improvements to Kings Ash Road, and the
surrounding road network, if necessary, to address the difficulties
experienced by HGVs and coaches on this section of Ring Road;
(2) the improvement of the Tweenaway Cross
junction, Paignton;
(3) improvements to the existing alignment
and junctions of the A3022 between Tweenaway Cross and Windy
Corner, Paignton;
(4) improvement to the Windy Corner junction,
Galmpton, Paignton; and
(5) improvement of the A379 Dartmouth Road
/ A3022 New Road junction, Churston.
Explanation:
15.104 The Western Corridor is defined as the A380/A3022
between Churscombe Cross and Windy Corner, including side roads
and other junctions directly affected by the route. The route
forms part of the Torbay Ring Road which is part of the National
Primary Route Network but it is accepted that its prime function
is to accommodate traffic with both origin and destination within
Torbay.
15.105 In April - June 1996 a Public Inquiry was held
into the planning application to construct Stages 3 and 4 of
the Torbay Ring Road. The Secretary of State accepted that steps
needed to be taken to relieve the traffic congestion caused by
the weight of traffic carried on the existing Kings Ash Road,
but ruled out the Plateau Route, which was the alignment of the
application, on planning and environmental grounds, concluding
that it had a “more damaging impact on the local environment
than the route identified in the adopted Torbay Local Plan” (i.e
the ‘Valley Route’).
15.106 The Secretary of State did not pass comment on
the Valley Route, but indicated that a fundamental reassessment
was required in order to establish whether road building was
the most sustainable option.
15.107 The Council therefore commissioned a transportation
study into the options for improving traffic and travel conditions
along the Western Corridor.
15.108 The key findings of this study indicate that the
main restrictions in traffic flow relate to the two junctions
of Tweenaway Cross and Windy Corner. Many other sections of this
route are identified as sub-standard, particularly Kings Ash
Hill and sections between Yalberton Road and Long Road. The study
identified in particular that the majority of traffic (around
80%) was locally based, undertaking relatively short trips along
the corridor for purposes of gaining access to employment sites,
residential areas and other activities. As a result, the emerging
strategy, which is fully detailed in the Local Transport Plan,
has identified a potential for significantly increasing the proportion
of travel undertaken by foot, cycle and public transport with
the appropriate improvement to the local infrastructure and bus
services to support this growth. The impact of additional traffic
generated by vital employment development in the Long Road/Yalberton
area should be reduced to a minimum by the introduction of travel
plans (see Policy T1).
15.109 The adopted strategy therefore concludes that it
will not be necessary to build a new road for the purposes of
providing adequate capacity to access the proposed developments
along this route. However, the gradient and condition of Kings
Ash Hill remains a significant problem. Improvements will therefore
be carried out to Kings Ash Road, and the surrounding road network
if necessary, to address the particular problems experienced
by HGVs and coaches.
15.110 This corridor is likely to be improved through
a series of improvement schemes to various sections of the road,
such as junction improvements at Tweenaway Cross and Churston
Cross. The Council will ensure that the environmental impact
on features such as Churston Common is minimised. Key schemes
such as these will be required to accommodate the additional
traffic from the proposed development sites identified in this
Plan. It will therefore be a requirement of development in this
area that appropriate contributions are made to the improvement
of the local road network and the provision of improved routes
for pedestrians and cyclists. A significantly improved public
transport system based on local bus services is also required
and will need to be supported in the early years by appropriate
contributions from developments. Torbay Council will also be
seeking appropriate support for the development of these services.
All contributions towards highway and transport improvements
will need to be secured by appropriate legal agreements.
T23 Torquay Northern Distributor Road
An extension to the new Torquay Northern Distributor
Road is proposed, comprising the improvement and extension to
Happaway Road/Coombe Road from an improved junction with Barton
Hill Road to a new junction with the A379 Teignmouth Road to
the north of the St. Marychurch Bypass.Explanation:
15.111 The development of a recognisable distributor road
across northern Torquay has progressed steadily over the past
10 years as part of the Scotts Bridge/Barton development. This
route now consists of the spine from Riviera Way to Beechfield
Avenue including the complementary Beechfield Avenue link. The
section of road between Barton Road and Teignmouth Road now appears
to form a missing gap in the completion of this northern distributor
road. However, as the Beechfield Avenue link has only recently
been completed, it is unclear at this stage as to whether there
is a significant volume of traffic which needs to cross the area
and whether this is causing environmental problems for residents
in that area. This indicates a need for further study once the
traffic patterns of the new road network have settled down and
the implications of the Barton/Hele/Watcombe Traffic Management
Zone which is currently being prepared, have been fully assessed.
It is therefore necessary to maintain the proposal to complete
the final section of the northern distributor road pending the
results of this up-to-date study.
T24 Traffic Management Zones
Traffic Management Zones will be implemented
in the areas shown on the Proposals Map, in the interests of
safety and amenity. Within these zones measures will be introduced
to reduce the speed of traffic, reduce unnecessary use of local
roads and achieve safer routes to schools, shops and other local
services. New development within or adjacent to these zones will
be required to make appropriate contributions to these works.
Explanation:
15.112 PPG13 ‘Transport’ (2001) indicates
that traffic management measures should be promoted to improve
the quality of local neighbourhoods, enhance the street environment
and improve road safety. Residential areas, shopping streets
and areas close to schools are appropriate for traffic management
(paragraph 68).
15.113 Many of the older residential areas of Torbay comprise
a mixture of sub-standard roads with difficult alignments, poor
footways and virtually no provision for cyclists. Public transport
has difficulty in accessing some areas and there is a general
wide-spread problem of traffic penetrating these areas, taking
short-cuts and often travelling at excessive speeds in relation
to the residential nature of the area. Similar concerns relate
to the traffic conditions around the local shopping centres and
the Council therefore is undertaking a series of investigations
to identify those areas at most risk from these problems. It
will bring forward, through the LTP, a series of measures in
each area which will seek to reduce the impact of this traffic.
Such schemes will usually comprise a variety of traffic management
or traffic calming and speed restraint measures with the aim
of improving road safety and reducing the impact of extraneous
traffic on these areas. The works involved with these schemes
will often be small scale and will be a significant benefit to
the safety and amenity of local residents, pedestrians, cyclists
and public transport users. It is important that such schemes
are carried out in consultation with the emergency services.
15.114 New development close to residential areas, schools,
etc. may be required to enter into legal agreements to ensure
that traffic generated by the development does not create additional
road hazards. Policy CF6 sets out a framework for developer contributions
towards infrastructure.
T25 Car parking in new development
Standards for the provision of private
parking spaces for all new development are set out in the schedule
below. The standards indicate a maximum provision that will
only be permitted where there is sufficient justification shown
for the full standards to be allocated.
Parking provision for major, non-residential
sites will be based on an assessment of parking needs, to be
defined as part of a travel plan to be submitted by the developer
and agreed by the local planning authority. Car parking provision
in excess of the assessed need will not be permitted, except
on a temporary basis during the implementation of the travel
plan.
Type of development
|
Estimated requirement
|
Notes (see Schedule)
|
RESIDENTIAL
|
a)
|
Dwelling houses
|
2 garages / car parking spaces per dwelling
unit within the curtilage; or
|
See Notes 9, 10 and 11. Developers should
have regard to the need to keep the average car parking
provision to no greater than 1.5 off-street spaces per
dwelling, in line with the advice in PPG3.
|
|
|
1 car parking space per dwelling plus 1
visitor's space per 2 dwellings located within reasonable
walking distance of the units to be served. In locations
such as town centres where services are readily accessible
by walking, cycling or public transport this standard may
be lowered to 1 garage / parking space per dwelling.
|
This standard would apply to the provision
of all or part of the parking in the communal areas.
|
b)
|
Flats
|
1 garage / parking space per unit plus 1
space per 2 units for visitors.
|
Where the levels of the site permit, it
may be appropriate that residents' parking spaces will
be provided within the building on new development. See
Notes 9, 10 and 11.
|
c)
|
Elderly persons' sheltered flats / dwellings
|
1 space per 2 units. 1 space per 2 units.
1 space per 2 units.
|
See Notes 4, 11 and 12.
|
d)
|
Homes for the elderly and people in need
of care
|
1 space per 8 residents.
|
See Note 4.
|
HOLIDAY DEVELOPMENTS
|
a)
|
Hotels and guest houses
|
1 space per letting bedroom, plus 1 coach
space per 15 bedrooms.
|
See Note 13.
|
b)
|
Holiday flats
|
1 garage / parking space per unit.
|
See Note 14.
|
c)
|
Caravans (static holiday)
|
1 parking space per unit.
|
|
d)
|
Holiday chalets
|
1 parking space per unit
|
|
SHOPS
|
a)
|
Food retail above threshold of 1,000m2
|
1 car space per every 14m2 of
gross floorspace.
|
this retail standard will not apply in town
and district centres, where the Local Planning Authority
will be looking to secure better use of existing off-street
parking, and achieving more short-term parking for shoppers
and tourists at the expense of long-term parking for commuters.
|
b)
|
Large non-food stores above threshold of
1,000m2
|
1 car space for every 20m2 gross
floorspace.
|
See Note 7.
|
c)
|
Garden centres
|
1 space for every 30m2 of display
area to which the public has access.
|
See Note 7.
|
HIGHER AND FURTHER
EDUCATION
|
a)
|
Higher and further education establishments
|
1 space per 2 staff, plus 1 space per 15
students attending the establishment.
|
Relates to total number of students visiting
the establishment, rather than full-time equivalent figures.
|
HOSTELS AND INSTITUTIONS
(including educational establishments not noted above)
|
a)
|
Hostels and institutions
|
Special evaluation required according to
type.
|
|
RESTAURANTS, FAST
FOOD TAKE AWAYS, PUBLIC HOUSES AND LICENSED CLUBS
|
a)
|
Restaurants, fast food take aways, public
houses and licensed clubs
|
Special evaluation required according to
location.
|
Should be located to use public parking
wherever possible.
|
PLACES OF ENTERTAINMENT
AND LEISURE
|
a)
|
Cinemas and conference facilities above
threshold of 1,000m2 of gross floorspace.
|
1 space per 5 seats.
|
|
b)
|
Class D2 (assembly and leisure other than
cinemas, conference facilities and stadia), above threshold
of 1,000m2
|
1 space per 22m2 of gross floorspace.
|
|
OFFICES AND INDUSTRY
|
a)
|
B1 including offices above threshold of
2,500m2 of gross floorspace
|
1 space per 30m2.
|
|
b)
|
B2 general industry
|
1 space per 35m2.
|
|
c)
|
B8 storage and distrubition uses as described
in Class B8 of the Town and Country Planning Use Classes
Order 1987 (as amended)
|
1 space per 200m2 of gross floorspace.
|
|
MOTOR REPAIR GARAGES
AND SERVICE STATIONS
|
a)
|
Motor repair garages and service stations
|
1 visitor's car space for every 10 cars
displayed for sale, 3 car spaces for each vehicle service
bay.
|
|
SQUASH COURTS
|
a)
|
Squash courts
|
1 car space per court plus 1 additional
space for every 10 spectator seats.
|
See Note 8.
|
SWIMMING POOLS
|
a)
|
Swimming pools
|
1 car space per 10m2 of eater
space.
|
See Note 8.
|
OTHER LEISURE AND
RECREATION FACILITIES (not noted above)
|
a)
|
Other leisure and recreation facilities
|
1 car space per 25m2.
|
|
MARINAS
|
a)
|
Marinas
|
1 car space for every 5 berths.
|
|
SHARED USE OF PARKING
|
|
|
Shared use of parking, particularly in town centres
and as part of some mixed use proposals, will be sought,
especially where peak parking levels from the different
uses do not coincide and there is good access by public
transport.
|
This standard will be applied to all developments where
there is a realistic potential for shared parking.
See Note 7.
|
SCHEDULE NOTES
For the purposes of interpretation, the following guidance
applies:-
1. Gross floor space means the total floor area of the building
contained within the external walls. Allowance has been made
for the unproductive elements of the building, e.g. lift shafts
or boiler rooms, etc. in the schedule.
2. The standards shown in the schedule are a maximum that will
be permitted should suitable justification be forthcoming. However,
in many cases, the number of permitted parking places will be
reduced in accordance with the level of accessibility assessed
for the site and the targets for car-based access set out in
the travel plan.
3. A car parking space is generally accepted as measuring 4.8
metres (16 feet) by 2.4 metres (8 feet) if manoeuvring space
is to be provided in front or behind it. Dimensions of 6.1 metres
(20 feet) by 2.4 metres (8 feet) may be needed if spaces are
formed end to end. The Local Planning Authority will normally
require safe access to places with sufficient manoeuvring space
and will expect individual cars to be capable of being parked
or moved without adjoining vehicles also having to move. Some
relaxation in the size of spaces may be given in the interest
of keeping the environmental impact of parking to a minimum.
The car park design should ensure that parking can be maintained
in a self-enforcing way so that vehicles are not blocked in or
vehicles are encouraged to park in landscaping areas or other
operations space.
4. Parking for disabled people should be provided in addition
to the maximum parking standards. Development proposals should
provide adequate parking for disabled motorists in terms of numbers
and design, which should comply with Traffic Advice Leaflet 5/95 “Parking
for Disabled People”. Off-street parking bays should be
a minimum of 4.8 metres (16 feet) long by 2.4 metres (8 feet)
wide, with an additional space of 1.8 metres (6 feet) where bays
are parallel to the access aisle or 1.2 metres (4 feet) where
bays are perpendicular to the access aisle. Where bays are perpendicular
to the access aisle, there should be an additional 1.2 metre
(4 feet) safety zone at the vehicle access end of each bay to
provide boot access or for use of a rear hoist. Such spaces shall
be level and pedestrian routes to and from them shall be free
of steps, bollards, steep slopes and other obstacles which disabled
people may find difficult to negotiate. Further guidance is provided
in Traffic Advice Leaflet 5/95.
5. All sites should include provision of secure, convenience
cycle parking spaces at a rate of 10% of the employees, visitors
or students likely to occupy the premises.
6. When determining planning applications for a change of use
of a property, the Local Planning Authority will take into account
the existing situation including how well the site is served
with public transport. In the event of it being anticipated that
the proposed use will not generate any additional demand on existing
parking, additional provision will not be required.
7. In the case of extensions to existing buildings, the requirements
will be applied only to the areas of extension. Any shortfall
in the existing situation will not normally be a reason for refusing
planning permission for the extension.
8. For mixed use development, the gross floorspace given over
to each use should be used to calculate the overall total maximum
parking figure. For land uses not covered in these standards,
the most stringent regional or local standards should apply.
9. In residential development, parking spaces on driveways
should normally be at a minimum length of 6.12 metres (20 feet)
to permit opening garage doors and avoid obstruction to the public
highway. Where the visitor’s parking space is sited alongside
the garage, the latter should be sited not less than 2.4 metres
(8 feet) from the highway to satisfy pedestrians’ visibility.
10. Whilst the Local Planning Authority urge planning applicants
and developers to consider the environmental advantages and the
benefits to householders of having a garage as opposed to an
open space, regard will be had to advice contained in relevant
Government guidance.
11. In connection with residential developments listed in the
schedule, the Local Planning Authority will have regard to government
advice on schemes financed by public expenditure where there
is complete control of occupancy and management. Accordingly,
the specified requirements may be deferred, although layouts
should allow sufficient flexibility to meet provision of parking
spaces at a later date. When dealing with planning applications
from the private sector for developments intended exclusively
for older people, the Local Planning Authority may require a
legal agreement to be entered into as a prerequisite of planning
permission to ensure that control over occupancy is maintained.
12. The Local Planning Authority will not insist on additional
car parking to serve a proposed ‘granny flat’. This
type of unit should be occupied exclusively by elderly relatives
and should be designed so as to form part of the house. It should
then be capable of being used as an extension to the property
when no longer required by the dependent relative. The authority
may limit occupancy by appropriate conditions or a legal agreement
if permission for such a use is given.
13. In determining the requirement for parking to serve hotel
guests, the Local Planning Authority will have regard to the
location of the hotel and its setting and will limit the parking
available where public spaces are available. On-site provision
for setting down and picking up guests by car or coach is desirable,
but will depend on the particular circumstances.
14. Parking to serve static caravans may be acceptable on spaces
between caravans, although this should first be agreed with the
Director of Environmental Services regarding Site Licence provisions.
15. Large retail or employment sites must made adequate provision
for penetration by local bus services and the provision of bus
stops / shelters close to the entrance to these buildings.
Explanation:
15.115 The provision of excessive levels of car parking
can encourage dependence on the use of private motor vehicles
and result in large areas of hard surfacing and inefficient use
of land. The Council has, following advice from the Government,
adopted a sustainable transport policy which seeks to reduce
dependence on private motor transport and encourages more sustainable
modes such as walking and cycling. The control on the availability
of private car parking is a key element of the strategy which
is consistent with the advice in PPG13 ‘Transport’ (2001).
15.116 These parking standards set out maximum provision
in line with the Regional Standards as required by PPG13 paragraph
53. Provision of a lower level of parking will be encouraged
in areas well served by public transport, such as town centres.
In less central areas, higher provision of parking than indicated
above will not be permitted where this would unduly advantage
out of town centre development. In order that the reduced level
of car parking does not cause excessive problems for the site
occupier and the local highway network, developers and occupiers
will be expected to implement travel plans which will seek to
manage the car parking areas and encourage use of alternative
modes of transport to the site.
15.117 Unless effective management of parking demand and
encouragement of alternative modes of transport can be demonstrated
at the time of the planning application, large car parks (in
excess of 10 vehicle spaces) will only be permitted on a temporary
basis (up to 3 years) thus allowing reassessment when planning
renewal is required. As an alternative developers may wish to
dedicate their parking for communal or public use in which case
the Council will be willing to undertake the management of that
parking space using pay and display to recover its costs.
15.118 The Council, through the policies being pursued
in the Local Transport Plan will seek to ensure that the complementary
provision of public transport, cycle routes, convenient cycle
parking facilities, and other measures designed to reduce dependence
on the private car will be implemented in association with new
development. Developer contributions towards off-site infrastructure
provision and the development of improved bus services may be
expected in appropriate cases. Further advice on travel plans
is set out in the Environmental Guide (Section 8).
T26 Access from development on to the highway
New development will not be permitted
unless:-
(1) the access to the highway is provided
to a safe standard and does not conflict with the function
of the route;
(2) the effects of the development on the
highway in terms of traffic and road safety are acceptable;
and
(3) the environmental impact arising as a
consequence of accessing and servicing the development is minimised.
Explanation:
15.119 Where a new access is to be constructed onto the
existing highway it must be built to a standard which does not
prejudice the safety and convenience of all users of the highway.
The Council will normally base its standards on the advice issued
by the Government in various publications. Specific local advice
may be found in the Council’s publication ‘Highways
in Residential and Commercial Estates’ together with any
updates which may subsequently be produced.
15.120 If a new development causes an obstruction of the
highway or creates difficulties for users of the highway, this
will be considered undesirable and could result in refusal of
planning permission.
15.121 Construction of a new access to appropriate standards
can sometimes result in the removal of hedges, trees, walls and
other existing features of the local scene. The removal of stone
walls can be particularly damaging to the character of the appearance
of Conservation Areas. The visual and ecological effect of the
necessary works will be assessed against the merits of the application
and any remedial measures that are proposed. Where access and
servicing arrangements to the new development cannot be constructed
without unacceptable visual or ecological impact then the application
will be refused. Development with sub-standard access and visibility
arrangements will not be acceptable due to increased risk of
accidents.
T27 Servicing
All new development should provide appropriate
road layouts and should be accessible to service vehicles, taking
into account the site’s topography and location. New and
existing commercial or retail developments should be serviced
in such a way as to avoid loading/unloading in main shopping
streets, pedestrian areas or traffic routes.
Explanation:
15.122 Adequate access for large lorries is often a vital
aspect of a successful commercial or retail development. Modern
vehicles require large areas for turning and parking which are
sometimes difficult to accommodate in existing urban areas. The
presence of large delivery vehicles in shopping streets is often
unacceptable due to the potential danger to pedestrians and the
general impact in terms of noise, fumes, visual impact etc. Similarly,
the delivery of goods to premises adjacent to busy highways can
cause difficulties and delays to other road users.
15.123 It is expected that new retail or commercial development
will be provided with adequate service and delivery facilities
off the highway. Advice on the appropriate standards can be found
in the Council’s publication ‘Highways in Residential
and Commercial Estates’, together with other relevant Government
and commercial publications. Where a new development can only
be serviced by parking on the existing highway, this will only
be permitted where it can be demonstrated that it would cause
no difficulties for other road users. Such schemes may be subject
to restrictions on the times when deliveries are permitted.
15.124 Where servicing is likely to impact on residential
amenity, it may also be necessary to impose conditions regulating
hours when servicing is permitted. However, these will be applied
sensitively so that the viability of mixed use developments in
town centres is not prejudiced.
|